Skip to content
FXOpen Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

4XC vs CGFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 4XC (4xCube Ltd) and CGFX (Commercial Group FX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers

4XC 6D Score
5.0
CGFX 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: 4xc-vs-cgfx

4XC and CGFX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, 4XC holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CGFX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology Weight4XCCGFXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.04.0+1.0CGFX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight4.05.0+1.0CGFX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0CGFX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: 4XC vs CGFX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: 4XC vs CGFX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between 4XC and CGFX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit Attribute4XCCGFX
Primary Legal Name4xCube LtdCommercial Group FX
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address1st Floor, BCI House, Avarua, Rarotonga, Cook IslandsPremier Business Center, 10th Floor, Sterling Tower, 14 Poudriere St.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForex, precious metals, index CFDs, cryptocurrencies and forward contractsPrecious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare 4XC and CGFX against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: 4XC vs CGFX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 4XC or CGFX?

Both 4XC and CGFX hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 4XC maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Supervisory Commission) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CGFX maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 4XC and CGFX?

In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 4XC records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with CGFX at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do 4XC and CGFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

4XC lists Forex, precious metals, index CFDs, cryptocurrencies and forward contracts with execution software [MT4, MT5], while CGFX lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 4XC or CGFX?

4XC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CGFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

4XC vs CGFX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXOpen Ledger