Skip to content
FXOpen Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

4XC vs Scope Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 4XC (4xCube Ltd) and Scope Markets (SM Capital Markets Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers

4XC 6D Score
5.0
Scope Markets 6D Score
6.5
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: 4xc-vs-scope-markets

Scope Markets outranks 4XC by +1.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, 4XC holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Scope Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology Weight4XCScope MarketsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.06.5+1.5Scope Markets
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.0+1.0Scope Markets
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight4.06.6+2.6Scope Markets
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: 4XC vs Scope Markets

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: 4XC vs Scope Markets
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between 4XC and Scope Markets.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit Attribute4XCScope Markets
Primary Legal Name4xCube LtdSM Capital Markets Ltd.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address1st Floor, BCI House, Avarua, Rarotonga, Cook Islands6160, Park Avenue, Buttonwood Bay, Lower Flat Office Space Front, Belize City, Belize Westside Towers, 4th Floor, Office 402 and 403, Lower Kabete Road, Westlands Room B11, 1st Floor, Providence Complex, Providence, Mahe, Seychelles. Office 2, Room 4, First Floor, Olivier Maradan Building, Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForex, precious metals, index CFDs, cryptocurrencies and forward contractsIndices, Forex, Stocks, Metals, Energies
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishOther languages, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare 4XC and Scope Markets against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: 4XC vs Scope Markets

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 4XC or Scope Markets?

Both 4XC and Scope Markets hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 4XC maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Supervisory Commission) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Scope Markets maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Belize (IFSC / FSC), Financial Services Authority Seychelles, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 4XC and Scope Markets?

In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 4XC records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Scope Markets at 6.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.6, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do 4XC and Scope Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

4XC lists Forex, precious metals, index CFDs, cryptocurrencies and forward contracts with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Scope Markets lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Metals, Energies with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 4XC or Scope Markets?

4XC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Scope Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

4XC vs Scope Markets (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXOpen Ledger