1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Red Mars vs UBA: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Red Mars (Red Mars Capital Ltd.) and UBA (United Bank for Africa) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- Red Mars 6D Score
- 5.0
- UBA 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Red Mars and UBA are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Red Mars holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas UBA holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Red Mars | UBA | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Red Mars vs UBA
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Red Mars | UBA |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Red Mars Capital Ltd. | United Bank for Africa |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1st floor, Visionhire Building, Marikas Kotopouli, 3030, LIMASSOL, CYPRUS | 57 Marina, Lagos Island, Lagos, Nigeria |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs, Forex, Currencies | Financial Services Banking Investment Services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | UBA Mobile Banking |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Swahili, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Red Mars and UBA against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Red Mars vs UBA
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Red Mars or UBA?
Both Red Mars and UBA hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Red Mars maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas UBA maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Red Mars and UBA?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Red Mars records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with UBA at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Red Mars and UBA differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Red Mars lists CFDs, Forex, Currencies with execution software [MT5], while UBA lists Financial Services Banking Investment Services with execution software [UBA Mobile Banking]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Red Mars or UBA?
Red Mars carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while UBA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.