1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
POWER TRADING vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of POWER TRADING (POWER TRADING) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- POWER TRADING 6D Score
- 5.0
- SCDEX 6D Score
- 9.3
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
SCDEX outranks POWER TRADING by +4.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, POWER TRADING holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | POWER TRADING | SCDEX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 9.3 | +4.3 | SCDEX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 9.5 | +4.5 | SCDEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 9.3 | +6.3 | SCDEX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 9.2 | +9.2 | SCDEX |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 9.4 | +4.4 | SCDEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 9.1 | +4.1 | SCDEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: POWER TRADING vs SCDEX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | POWER TRADING | SCDEX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | POWER TRADING | SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Low risk |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | UNIT 225-22 2/F MEGA CUBE 8 WANG KWONG ROAD KOWLOON BAY KL Hong Kong | 1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, precious metals, indices, crude oil | Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare POWER TRADING and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: POWER TRADING vs SCDEX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: POWER TRADING or SCDEX?
POWER TRADING holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, POWER TRADING maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between POWER TRADING and SCDEX?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), POWER TRADING records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).
How do POWER TRADING and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
POWER TRADING lists Forex, precious metals, indices, crude oil with execution software [MT4], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: POWER TRADING or SCDEX?
POWER TRADING carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.