1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Markup Trade vs MIC: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Markup Trade (Markup Trade LTD) and MIC (Multi Investment Company Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- Markup Trade 6D Score
- 1.3
- MIC 6D Score
- 1.4
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
MIC outranks Markup Trade by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.4 vs 1.3)
On supervisory breadth, Markup Trade holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MIC holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Markup Trade | MIC | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.3 | 1.4 | +0.1 | MIC |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.3 | 1.4 | +0.1 | MIC |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.3 | 1.4 | +0.1 | MIC |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.3 | 1.4 | +0.1 | MIC |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Markup Trade vs MIC
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Markup Trade | MIC |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Markup Trade LTD | Multi Investment Company Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 43 Great George Street, St.Great George, Roseau, Dominica Marka Radovica ul E3 40 Podgorica/Montenegro | -- |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, global indices, stocks, global stock trading exchange, commodities, cryptocurrencies, energy | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Markup Trade and MIC against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Markup Trade vs MIC
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Markup Trade or MIC?
Both Markup Trade and MIC hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Markup Trade maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MIC maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Markup Trade and MIC?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Markup Trade records an Overall Score of 1.3 (Risk & Licensing: 1.3, Brand: 1.3, Market Influence: 1.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with MIC at 1.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.4, Market Influence: 1.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Markup Trade and MIC differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Markup Trade lists FX, global indices, stocks, global stock trading exchange, commodities, cryptocurrencies, energy with execution software [MT5], while MIC lists Forex with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Markup Trade or MIC?
Markup Trade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MIC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.