1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
JMI vs QIWI: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of JMI (JMI Brokers LTD) and QIWI (QIWI) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- JMI 6D Score
- 3.0
- QIWI 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
JMI and QIWI are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, JMI holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas QIWI holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | JMI | QIWI | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 3.0 | +3.0 | JMI |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: JMI vs QIWI
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | JMI | QIWI |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | JMI Brokers LTD | QIWI |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1276, Govant Building, Kumul Highway, Port Vila Republic of Vanuatu | Kazakhstan, 050059, Almaty, Kozybayev str., 212 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Currency pairs, spot precious metals, precious metal futures (OTC), currency futures, energy futures, and stock indices. | Electronic payments and financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | QIWI Wallet |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare JMI and QIWI against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: JMI vs QIWI
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: JMI or QIWI?
Both JMI and QIWI hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, JMI maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas QIWI maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between JMI and QIWI?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), JMI records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with QIWI at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do JMI and QIWI differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
JMI lists Currency pairs, spot precious metals, precious metal futures (OTC), currency futures, energy futures, and stock indices. with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while QIWI lists Electronic payments and financial services with execution software [QIWI Wallet]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: JMI or QIWI?
JMI carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while QIWI carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.