Skip to content
FXOpen Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

JMI vs PayOnline: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of JMI (JMI Brokers LTD) and PayOnline (PayOnline) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers

JMI 6D Score
3.0
PayOnline 6D Score
2.8
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: jmi-vs-payonline

JMI outranks PayOnline by +0.2 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.8)

On supervisory breadth, JMI holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PayOnline holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightJMIPayOnlineScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite3.02.8+0.2JMI
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight3.02.8+0.2JMI
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight3.02.8+0.2JMI
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.02.8+3.2JMI

Visual Architecture Benchmark: JMI vs PayOnline

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: JMI vs PayOnline
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between JMI and PayOnline.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeJMIPayOnline
Primary Legal NameJMI Brokers LTDPayOnline
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / Address1276, Govant Building, Kumul Highway, Port Vila Republic of VanuatuInternational
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCurrency pairs, spot precious metals, precious metal futures (OTC), currency futures, energy futures, and stock indices.Integrated payment
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare JMI and PayOnline against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: JMI vs PayOnline

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: JMI or PayOnline?

Both JMI and PayOnline hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, JMI maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PayOnline maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between JMI and PayOnline?

In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), JMI records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with PayOnline at 2.8 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.8, Brand: 2.8, Market Influence: 2.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do JMI and PayOnline differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

JMI lists Currency pairs, spot precious metals, precious metal futures (OTC), currency futures, energy futures, and stock indices. with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while PayOnline lists Integrated payment with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: JMI or PayOnline?

JMI carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PayOnline carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

JMI vs PayOnline (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | FXOpen Ledger