1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
JFD vs MonoSwap: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of JFD (JFD Group Ltd) and MonoSwap (MonoSwap) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- JFD 6D Score
- 6.5
- MonoSwap 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
JFD outranks MonoSwap by +5.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, JFD holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MonoSwap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | JFD | MonoSwap | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.5 | 1.0 | +5.5 | JFD |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | JFD |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | JFD |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.7 | 1.0 | +5.7 | JFD |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | JFD |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: JFD vs MonoSwap
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | JFD | MonoSwap |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | JFD Group Ltd | MonoSwap |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 70, Kyrillou Loukareos Street, Kakos Premier Tower, 2nd Floor CY-4156 Limassol。 | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds | decentralised trading, liquidity provision, yield mining, Launchpad, cross-chain asset bridging |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare JFD and MonoSwap against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: JFD vs MonoSwap
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: JFD or MonoSwap?
JFD holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, JFD maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (CNMV, CYSEC, VFSC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MonoSwap maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between JFD and MonoSwap?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), JFD records an Overall Score of 6.5 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.7, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with MonoSwap at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do JFD and MonoSwap differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
JFD lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MonoSwap lists decentralised trading, liquidity provision, yield mining, Launchpad, cross-chain asset bridging with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: JFD or MonoSwap?
JFD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MonoSwap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.