1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
ICORating vs Immutable Holdings: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ICORating (ICORating Limited) and Immutable Holdings (Immutable Holdings Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- ICORating 6D Score
- 1.0
- Immutable Holdings 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Immutable Holdings outranks ICORating by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, ICORating holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Immutable Holdings holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | ICORating | Immutable Holdings | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Immutable Holdings |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Immutable Holdings |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Immutable Holdings |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Immutable Holdings |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: ICORating vs Immutable Holdings
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | ICORating | Immutable Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | ICORating Limited | Immutable Holdings Inc. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare ICORating and Immutable Holdings against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: ICORating vs Immutable Holdings
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ICORating or Immutable Holdings?
Both ICORating and Immutable Holdings hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, ICORating maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Immutable Holdings maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ICORating and Immutable Holdings?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ICORating records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Immutable Holdings at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do ICORating and Immutable Holdings differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
ICORating lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Immutable Holdings lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ICORating or Immutable Holdings?
ICORating carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Immutable Holdings carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.