1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Hyperliquid vs Sword Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Hyperliquid (Hyperliquid) and Sword Capital (Sword Capital Corporation) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- Hyperliquid 6D Score
- 5.6
- Sword Capital 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Hyperliquid outranks Sword Capital by +4.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.6 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Hyperliquid holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Sword Capital holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Hyperliquid | Sword Capital | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.6 | 1.0 | +4.6 | Hyperliquid |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.2 | 1.0 | +4.2 | Hyperliquid |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | Hyperliquid |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | Hyperliquid |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.5 | 1.0 | +4.5 | Hyperliquid |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Hyperliquid vs Sword Capital
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Hyperliquid | Sword Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Hyperliquid | Sword Capital Corporation |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | - | Kuwait Sharq Blk7 Tower44 Floor 19-18 Gate Village, Building 04, Level 03 , Business Center , Office 02 Dubai International Financial Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates Office No 6 1st Floor, Dekk House, Zippora Street, Providence Industrial Estate, Mahe, Seychelles Egypt Cairo – Nile City Towers – North Tower 22 Floor |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Trading | FX, commodities, stocks, futures, options, bonds, warrants, CFDs |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Hyperliquid and Sword Capital against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Hyperliquid vs Sword Capital
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Hyperliquid or Sword Capital?
Sword Capital holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Hyperliquid maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Sword Capital maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Hyperliquid and Sword Capital?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Hyperliquid records an Overall Score of 5.6 (Risk & Licensing: 5.2, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Sword Capital at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Hyperliquid and Sword Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Hyperliquid lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Sword Capital lists FX, commodities, stocks, futures, options, bonds, warrants, CFDs with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Hyperliquid or Sword Capital?
Hyperliquid carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Sword Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.