1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Fxcess vs JMI: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fxcess (Fxcess) and JMI (JMI Brokers LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- Fxcess 6D Score
- 3.0
- JMI 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Fxcess and JMI are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Fxcess holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas JMI holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Fxcess | JMI | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 6.0 | +3.0 | JMI |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fxcess vs JMI
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Fxcess | JMI |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Fxcess | JMI Brokers LTD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | The Valley, AI2640, Cosely Drive, 1338, AI | 1276, Govant Building, Kumul Highway, Port Vila Republic of Vanuatu |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex | Currency pairs, spot precious metals, precious metal futures (OTC), currency futures, energy futures, and stock indices. |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Indonesian, Spanish, Dutch, Vietnamese, Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, French, Thai | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Fxcess and JMI against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Fxcess vs JMI
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fxcess or JMI?
Both Fxcess and JMI hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Fxcess maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas JMI maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fxcess and JMI?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fxcess records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with JMI at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Fxcess and JMI differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Fxcess lists Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex with execution software [MT4], while JMI lists Currency pairs, spot precious metals, precious metal futures (OTC), currency futures, energy futures, and stock indices. with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fxcess or JMI?
Fxcess carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while JMI carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.