1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FX CLearing vs Fxcess: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FX CLearing (FXCL Markets Ltd.) and Fxcess (Fxcess) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- FX CLearing 6D Score
- 3.0
- Fxcess 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FX CLearing and Fxcess are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, FX CLearing holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Fxcess holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FX CLearing | Fxcess | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FX CLearing vs Fxcess
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FX CLearing | Fxcess |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FXCL Markets Ltd. | Fxcess |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Plot 54368 Western Commercial Road, The Hub, Itowers, CBD, Gaborone, Botswana | The Valley, AI2640, Cosely Drive, 1338, AI |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, precious metals, indices, cryptocurrencies, commodities, fund management, clearing, primary brokerage and other legal activities | Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Arabic, Vietnamese, Malay, Lao, English, Thai | Indonesian, Spanish, Dutch, Vietnamese, Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, French, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FX CLearing and Fxcess against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FX CLearing vs Fxcess
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FX CLearing or Fxcess?
Both FX CLearing and Fxcess hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FX CLearing maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Fxcess maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FX CLearing and Fxcess?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FX CLearing records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Fxcess at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do FX CLearing and Fxcess differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FX CLearing lists Forex, precious metals, indices, cryptocurrencies, commodities, fund management, clearing, primary brokerage and other legal activities with execution software [MT4], while Fxcess lists Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FX CLearing or Fxcess?
FX CLearing carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Fxcess carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.