1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Easy Fund vs FTMO: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Easy Fund (Easy Fund) and FTMO (FTMO) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- Easy Fund 6D Score
- 5.0
- FTMO 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Easy Fund and FTMO are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Easy Fund holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FTMO holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Easy Fund | FTMO | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Easy Fund vs FTMO
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Easy Fund | FTMO |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Easy Fund | FTMO |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 34 BREE STREET 11TH FLOOR Cape Town Western Cape, South Africa | Quadrio offices Purkynova 2121/3 110 00 Prague, Czech Republic |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Czech, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Easy Fund and FTMO against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Easy Fund vs FTMO
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Easy Fund or FTMO?
Both Easy Fund and FTMO hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Easy Fund maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FTMO maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Easy Fund and FTMO?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Easy Fund records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with FTMO at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Easy Fund and FTMO differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Easy Fund lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FTMO lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Easy Fund or FTMO?
Easy Fund carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FTMO carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.