1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CENTAXA vs Close Option: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CENTAXA (CENTAXA) and Close Option (Close Option) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Global foreign exchange, CFD and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers
- CENTAXA 6D Score
- 1.0
- Close Option 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CENTAXA and Close Option are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, CENTAXA holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Close Option holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CENTAXA | Close Option | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CENTAXA vs Close Option
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CENTAXA | Close Option |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CENTAXA | Close Option |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | - | Vake-saburtalo district, Al Kazvegi ave. N41 Apt.N19, Tbilisi, Georgia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | Binary options, Currency pairs |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CENTAXA and Close Option against other regulated peers in our global foreign exchange, cfd and currency-pair dealers outside regional registers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CENTAXA vs Close Option
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CENTAXA or Close Option?
Both CENTAXA and Close Option hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CENTAXA maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Close Option maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CENTAXA and Close Option?
In FXOpen Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CENTAXA records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Close Option at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do CENTAXA and Close Option differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CENTAXA lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Close Option lists Binary options, Currency pairs with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CENTAXA or Close Option?
CENTAXA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Close Option carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.